Skip to main content
Per-tree leaf area index mapping of Amsterdam’s unrecorded shade canopy

Per-tree leaf area index mapping of Amsterdam’s unrecorded shade canopy

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Théo Alessandro Hermann, Michiel van Selm, Titus Venverloo, Fabio Duarte, Carlo Ratti

Abstract

Most of the trees shading Amsterdam are absent from any municipal record. Using the Dutch national LiDAR survey (AHN5), we derive per-tree Leaf Area Index for nearly 850,000 trees across 243km2. Roughly 62% of the canopy is unrecorded, and these unregistered trees carry a disproportionate share (about two-thirds) of the city’s gross shade, so most of this shade-providing canopy lies outside the systems meant to manage it. Uniform-transmissivity models correctly diagnose where shade is scarce (ρ = 0.997) but not what produces it: measured per-tree canopy transmission averages several times the single value they assume (bounded ≈2–4×), and the densest genus casts 11% more shade per crown than the sparsest. Within-neighbourhood density variation adds up to 5.7 percentage points of shade (2.8 on average) that averaged models erase. Ninety-five percent of neighbourhoods fall below the 30% canopy-cover target. Comparable national LiDAR across Europe and the US suggests the method is transferable, pending validation at other point densities and canopy types.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5G20F

Subjects

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Engineering, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology

Keywords

Urban Trees, Leaf Area Index, Urban Heat Island, Shade Equity, LiDar, Urban Forest Inventory

Dates

Published: 2026-07-08 14:49

Last Updated: 2026-07-08 14:49

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data Availability:
Data will be made available on github upon acceptance on peer-reviewed submission

Metrics

Views: 23

Downloads: 5