Skip to main content
The remote reference as an instrumental variable in model space: time-series magnetotelluric inversion with noisy magnetic fields

The remote reference as an instrumental variable in model space: time-series magnetotelluric inversion with noisy magnetic fields

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Seokhoon Oh 

Abstract

Noise in the local magnetic field biases magnetotelluric (MT) responses, and a relevant, valid remote magnetic record removes the bias. For an earth model inverted from time series, remote referencing becomes estimating equations: the residual formed with the local field is orthogonal to the sensitivities driven by its projection on the remote field. Their solution, relevance and validity must be checked separately, and their scores over blocks of time supply the covariance of the root and a test of the remote site. Minimizing the misfit with the projected field as driver does not solve them. On observatory records rebuilt without noise it misses the model by up to 0.9 percent of the impedance, and the root, found by fixed point and Newton iterations, by 0.02 percent at most. The standard error shows neither failure of the instrument. A weak instrument draws the root toward the single-site response, as the share of the local field explained by the projection predicts. A remote site that the noise reaches moves the root toward the relation of the noise, and the difference of the roots with two remote sites, judged with the covariance of their common blocks, detects it. Near 25-kV railways, survey sites 1.5 to 12.5 km away fail this test in 49 of 61 testable pairs while trains run and in none of 63 at night, and a remote field 1090 km away passes it against four observatories in all 71 testable cases at the one percent level. With railway noise over whole days, the root and a standard robust code followed by a model recover the response on 61 and 58 of 80 records, so the method is not a better remote reference in itself. Its free-transfer-function form gives the full tensor and tipper of a railway record from service hours.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5DF8N

Subjects

Geophysics and Seismology

Keywords

magnetotellurics; remote reference; instrumental variable; time-series inversion; cultural noise; electrified railway; uncertainty

Dates

Published: 2026-10-31 21:41

Last Updated: 2026-10-31 21:41

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
no

Data Availability:
Parkfield and Hollister records (network BK, stations PKD and SAO) are open at the Northern California Earthquake Data Center. The 1-s records of the observatories Kakioka, Kanoya and Memambetsu (JMA) are open at the World Data Center for Geomagnetism, Kyoto, and that of Cheongyang (KMA) through INTERMAGNET. The Korean records (Haenam, Gyeongju) and the Japanese remote record (Sawauchi) are available from the author on request, subject to the permission of the data providers. Code and result files are available from the author on request and will be archived with a DOI at journal publication.

Metrics

Views: 6

Downloads: 1