COVID-19 Impacts Highlight the Need for Holistic Evaluation of Research in the Hydrologic Sciences

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030930. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Adam Scott Ward 

Abstract

As we reckon with the effect of COVID-19 on the research enterprise in hydrologic science, it is important to acknowledge that disruptions will be persistent and that institutional-level adjustments, while helpful, are not sufficient to mitigate all impacts on hydrologic scientists. Here, we describe the breadth of research contributions in the hydrologic sciences, consider how the pandemic has impacted this portfolio of contributions, document one impact that is already being realized in publication of research, and suggest guidance to the hydrologic science community, institutions, review panels, and funding organizations in considering these impacts at various stages of hiring and promotion in our community. Acknowledging the diversity of contributions to research is particularly valuable because it provides a more objective, transparent, and holistic basis for evaluating individuals within the context of norms of the hydrologic science community. With clearly established values, it is easier to identify impacts of life events, such as those related to the COVID-19 pandemic, as they are manifested in individuals under a diversity of circumstances.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5BW5C

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Hydrology, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

COVID-19, Pandemic, promotion, tenure, reserach, comment, opinion

Dates

Published: 2021-12-06 03:52

Last Updated: 2022-02-11 12:54

Older Versions
License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The opinions expressed in this commentary reflect the views of the authors and should not be construed as endorsement nor concurrency of funding agencies nor the authors’ individual institutions.

Data Availability (Reason not available):
The data are available from Water Resources Reserach by request