Potential for Perceived Failure of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Deployment

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210036119. This is version 4 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Patrick W Keys , Elizabeth A Barnes, Noah S Diffenbaugh, James W Hurrell, Curtis M Bell

Abstract

As anthropogenic activities warm the Earth, the fundamental solution of reducing greenhouse gas emissions remains elusive. Given this mitigation gap, global warming may lead to intolerable climate changes as adaptive capacity is exceeded. Thus, there is emerging interest in solar radiation modification, which is the process of deliberately increasing Earth's albedo to cool the planet. Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) — the theoretical deployment of particles in the stratosphere to enhance reflection of incoming solar radiation — is one strategy to slow, pause or reverse global warming. If SAI is ever pursued it will likely be for a specific aim, such as affording time to implement mitigation strategies, lessening extremes, or reducing the odds of reaching a biogeophysical tipping point. Using an ensemble climate model experiment that simulates the deployment of SAI in the context of an intermediate greenhouse gas trajectory, we quantify the probability that internal climate variability masks the effectiveness of SAI deployment on regional temperatures. We find that, while global temperature is stabilized, substantial land areas continue to experience warming. For example, in the SAI scenario we explore, up to 55% of the global population experiences rising temperatures over the decade following SAI deployment, and large areas exhibit high probability of extremely hot years. These conditions could cause SAI to be perceived as a failure. Countries with the largest economies experience some of the largest probabilities of this perceived failure. The potential for perceived failure could therefore have major implications for policy decisions in the years immediately following SAI deployment.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5805S

Subjects

Atmospheric Sciences, Climate, Sustainability

Keywords

climate change, internal climate variability, Solar Geoengineering, perception, mitigation, global warming, stratospheric aerosol injection

Dates

Published: 2022-06-17 09:25

Last Updated: 2022-12-21 00:34

Older Versions
License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability (Reason not available):
All data used in this analysis is publicly available.