Marine Radiocarbon Calibration in Polar Regions: A Simple Approximate Approach using Marine20

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Timothy J Heaton , Martin Butzin, Edouard Bard, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Konrad A Hughen, Peter Koehler, Paula J Reimer

Abstract

The Marine20 radiocarbon (14C) age calibration curve, and all earlier marine radiocarbon calibration curves from the IntCal group, must be used extremely cautiously for the calibration of marine 14C samples from polar regions (outside ~ 40ºS – 40ºN) during glacial periods. Calibrating polar 14C marine samples from glacial periods against any Marine calibration curve (Marine20 or any earlier product) using an estimate of ΔR, the regional 14C depletion adjustment, that has been obtained from samples in the recent (non-glacial) past is likely to lead to bias and overconfidence in the calibrated age. We propose an approach to calibration that aims to address this by accounting for the possibility of additional, localized, glacial 14C depletion in polar oceans. We suggest, for a specific polar location, bounds on the value of ΔR_20 (θ) during a glacial period. The lower bound ΔR_20^Hol may be based on 14C samples from the recent non-glacial past (Holocene) and corresponds to a low-depletion glacial scenario; while an upper bound representing high-depletion, ΔR_20^GS, is found by increasing ΔR_20^Hol according to the latitude of the 14C sample to be calibrated. The suggested increases to obtain ΔR_20^GS are based upon simulations of the Hamburg Large Scale Geostrophic Ocean General Circulation Model (LSG OGCM). Calibrating against the Marine20 curve using the upper and lower ΔR_20 bounds provide estimates of calibrated ages for glacial 14C samples in high- and low-depletion scenarios which should bracket the true calendar age of the sample. In some circumstances, users may be able to determine which depletion scenario is more appropriate using independent paleoclimatic or proxy evidence.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5P92G

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Mathematics, Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Statistics and Probability

Keywords

radiocarbon calibration, Polar Regions, Marine Reservoir Age, DeltaR, Marine20, Marine Reservoir Age, DeltaR, Marine20

Dates

Published: 2022-09-22 17:17

Last Updated: 2022-09-22 21:17

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.