Environmental monitoring of antimicrobial resistant bacteria in North Carolina water and wastewater using the WHO Tricycle protocol in combination with membrane filtration and compartment bag test methods for detecting and quantifying ESBL E. coli

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000117. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Clark Appling, Mark D Sobsey , Lisa M. Durso, Michael B. Fisher 

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing threat to human and animal health, and efforts to combat it require widespread, robust and practical monitoring of AMR presence in humans, animals, and the environment. Because early AMR monitoring efforts were cumbersome, costly, and lacked standardization, the WHO Tricycle Protocol (WHO TP) was developed and released in 2021 to standardize and streamline global AMR monitoring by culturing a single indicator organism, extended-spectrum--lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec), The WHO TP culture-based method detects and quantifies ESBL-Ec by either spread plating or membrane filtration on either MacConkey or TBX agar (supplemented with cefotaxime), which are difficult methods to use in low-resource and field settings, and must be done mostly in lab settings by trained personnel. Therefore, we simultaneously detected and quantified ESBL-Ec in field samples using the WHO TP with membrane filtration (WHO TP MF) and also a simplified method, the compartment bag test (CBT), which quantifies different sample volumes as positive or negative for target bacteria and is easy for anyone to use in the field. We collected and analyzed municipal wastewater, surface water, and chicken waste samples from sites in Raleigh and Chapel Hill, NC over an 8-month period. Presumptive ESBL-Ec were quantified using WHO TP MF on TBX agar supplemented with cefotaxime, as well as using the CBT with chromogenic E. coli medium containing cefotaxime. Presumptive ESBL-Ec bacteria were isolated from completed tests for confirmation and characterization by Kirby Bauer disk diffusion tests (for antibiotic sensitivity) and EnteroPluri tests (to speciate isolates). The WHO TP MF and the CBT methods were both easy to use, but the MF test required additional time and effort. The proportion of E. coli that were presumptively ESBL in surface water samples was significantly greater downstream vs upstream of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) outfalls in both locations, suggesting that treated wastewater is a source of ESBL-Ec in some surface waters. The results of CBT and WHO TP MF tests were comparable, making the former method suitable as an alternative to the more complex WHO TP MF procedure. Further AMR surveillance using both the WHO TP MF and simpler CBT methods may be useful to further characterize and refine their performance for quantifying AMR occurrence in NC and elsewhere.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5SW9X

Subjects

Civil and Environmental Engineering

Keywords

monitoring, tricycle protocol, world health organization, WHO, poultry, Antibiotic Resistance, antibiotic, WHO tricycle protocol, surveillance, AMR, environment, wastewater, Water, ESBL, E. coli, Antimicrobial Resistance, antimicrobial

Dates

Published: 2023-03-31 14:11

Last Updated: 2023-03-31 21:11

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data Availability (Reason not available):
Before publication, all data used in this manuscript and underlying its findings will be made fully available and without restriction in supplementary files.

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that we have no competing interests as defined by PLOS Water, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the interpretation of the article.