Skip to main content
Lunar Formation by Triple Phase Transition in the Differentiating Proto-Earth

Lunar Formation by Triple Phase Transition in the Differentiating Proto-Earth

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20367218. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Michel DEBAILLEUL 

Abstract

The origin of the Moon remains one of the open questions of planetary science. The canonical giant impact model (Theia collision) predicts neither the near-isotopic identity of Earth and Moon, nor the crustal dichotomy, nor the ≈ 300 Myr delay of the terrestrial dynamo. The synestia model faces the same limitations. This work is conceptually distinct from both: it requires no external impactor, no synestia, and no free parameter — only the inevitable physical consequences of terrestrial accretion.
The starting point is thermodynamic and non-negotiable: the gravitational energy released during accretion exceeds the mantle fusion energy by a factor of 155. The proto-Earth is therefore necessarily a fully molten, rapidly rotating magma sphere (T_rot ≈ 5 h), without a stabilizing satellite, evolving in a permanently out-of-equilibrium Hadean environment. The unique driving force — progressive Fe-Ni segregation — orchestrates three coupled transitions constituting the Triple Phase Transition (TPT): (1) Rheological — the silicate melt acquires a yield stress (Bingham-Herschel law, τ_y ∈ [10², 10⁴] Pa) and organises a Coherent Magmatic Torus (CMT) in the Hadean intertropical belt |φ| < 30° of the co-rotating body frame — not the geographic equator; (2) Mechanical — elliptical parametric resonance (Malkus 1968; Kerswell 2002; Lacaze et al. 2004) drives the CMT to bifurcation velocity U_crit ≈ 9.8 km/s in ≈ 32 hours, entirely determined by the Maclaurin flattening f = 0.107 — no free parameter — producing N = 2–3 cohesive ejection episodes in 3–4 weeks; (3) Magnetic — the terrestrial dynamo ignites 290–360 Myr after ejection, consistent with Jack Hills zircon palaeomagnetic data. The CMT mass (M_TMC ≈ 2.3 × 10²² kg) is internally constrained from the observed radius of the first accretion layer. The crustal dichotomy emerges as a direct mechanical consequence of the asymmetric second episode. The apparent paradox between a 3–4 week formation and a 40 Myr Fe-Ni segregation is resolved by two distinct physical timescales: global segregation (τ_seg ≈ 40 Myr) charges the system; local Stokes redistribution within the CMT (τ_Stokes ≈ 257 s, fully derived) stamps each ejection episode with a chemically distinct signature.
A native WebGL interactive simulation illustrates the full dynamics in real time with adjustable parameters (ε, Ω, α, f_cap, N, T-Tauri intensity).
The model formulates ten quantitative and falsifiable predictions. The central prediction — seismic interface at d ≈ 200–315 km, impedance contrast |R| ∈ [0.01; 0.04] — will be directly tested by the Chang'e 7 broadband seismometer at the lunar south pole in August 2026, a mission specifically designed to probe lunar internal structure and seismic stratigraphy. A pre-existing Fe enrichment detected by Lunar Prospector at the south pole (P3b) constitutes an independent observational convergence with the TPT stratigraphic prediction. The geochemical predictions — Fe/Si depth gradient, Hf-W chronometry at 4.467 Ga, formation age > 4.45 Ga — are testable by Artemis III (2028–2029), which will collect mantle samples exposed by the South Pole-Aitken basin, the deepest and oldest impact structure on the Moon. This deposit pre-registers all ten predictions prior to these mission data.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5XB6H

Subjects

Astrophysics and Astronomy, Earth Sciences, Physics, Planetary Sciences, The Sun and the Solar System

Keywords

Lunar formation, Triple Phase Transition, Hadean proto-Earth, Elliptical parametric resonance, Fe-Ni segregation, Coherent Magmatic Torus, Seismic interface, Crustal dichotomy, Hadean dynamo, Chang'e 7, Artemis III, Maclaurin spheroid, Bingham-Herschel rheology, South Pole-Aitken basin, Lunar magma ocean

Dates

Published: 2026-05-28 14:15

Last Updated: 2026-05-28 14:15

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20367218

Metrics

Views: 139

Downloads: 2