Machine Learning for Inferring CO2 Fluxes: The New Metaphysics of Neural Nets

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 3 of this Preprint.

This Preprint has no visible version.

Download Preprint
Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Phuong Nguyen, Milton Halem

Abstract

The advent of direct high-resolution global surface measurements of CO2 from the recently launched NASA Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO-2) satellite offers an opportunity to improve the estimate of Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) over land. Long-term measurements of CO2flux obtained from eddy covariance instruments on Flux towers show large annual differences with NEE calculated by inverse methods using Land Surface Photosynthetic models. This suggests consideration of alternative approaches for calculating seasonal to annual global CO2 flux over land. Recent advances in deep machine learning models, including recurrent neural nets, have been successfully applied to many inverse measurement problems in the Earth and space sciences. We present evaluations of two deep machine learning models for estimating CO2 flux or NEE using station tower data acquired from the DOE Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM), AmeriFlux and Fluxnet2015 station datasets. Our results indicate that deep learning models employing Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) with the Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) provide significantly more accurate predictions of CO2 flux (~22% -28% improvements) than Feed Forward Neural Nets (FFNN) in terms of Root Mean Square Errors, correlation coefficients and anomaly correlations with observations. It was found that using heat flux as input variables also produce more accurate CO2 flux or NEE predictions. A non-intuitive machine learning metaphysical result was observed by the omission of CO2 concentrations as an input variable. Neural net models, in most cases, produce comparable accuracies of CO2 flux or NEE inferences, when trained with and without CO2 for the same station data.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/osf.io/284f5

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Other Earth Sciences, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

Deep learning, LSTM, CO2Flux, NEE

Dates

Published: 2019-10-24 08:07

Last Updated: 2019-11-15 12:15

Older Versions
License

GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) 2.1